Employment and Labour Law

 

 

 

No.  ROTAs are not automatically enforceable in South Africa.  South African law recognizes the principle of freedom of trade and the right to earn a living.  Courts carefully scrutinize ROTAs to ensure they are reasonable and justifiable before enforcing them. An unreasonable ROTA will likely be deemed unenforceable and against public policy.

Yes, employees can challenge the enforceability of a ROTA in court if they believe it is unreasonable or unlawful. Common grounds for challenging a ROTA include arguing that it is:

  • Unreasonable in Scope, Duration, or Geography: Too broad, too long, or covers an unjustifiable area.
  • Not Protecting a Legitimate Business Interest: The employer is not genuinely protecting confidential information or client connections, but simply trying to stifle competition unfairly.
  • Against Public Policy: The restraint is harmful to the public interest or unduly restricts the employee's right to earn a living.
  • Lack of Consideration (Potentially): In some cases, arguing insufficient or no additional consideration was given for the restraint.
  • If you believe your ROTA is unenforceable, consult with Aucamp Attorneys to assess your legal options and potential for challenging the agreement in court.

Yes, employees can challenge the enforceability of a ROTA in court if they believe it is unreasonable or unlawful. Common grounds for challenging a ROTA include arguing that it is:

  • Unreasonable in Scope, Duration, or Geography: Too broad, too long, or covers an unjustifiable area.
  • Not Protecting a Legitimate Business Interest: The employer is not genuinely protecting confidential information or client connections, but simply trying to stifle competition unfairly.
  • Against Public Policy: The restraint is harmful to the public interest or unduly restricts the employee's right to earn a living.
  • Lack of Consideration (Potentially): In some cases, arguing insufficient or no additional consideration was given for the restraint.
  • If you believe your ROTA is unenforceable, consult with Aucamp Attorneys to assess your legal options and potential for challenging the agreement in court.

Yes, employees can challenge the enforceability of a ROTA in court if they believe it is unreasonable or unlawful. Common grounds for challenging a ROTA include arguing that it is:

  • Unreasonable in Scope, Duration, or Geography: Too broad, too long, or covers an unjustifiable area.
  • Not Protecting a Legitimate Business Interest: The employer is not genuinely protecting confidential information or client connections, but simply trying to stifle competition unfairly.
  • Against Public Policy: The restraint is harmful to the public interest or unduly restricts the employee's right to earn a living.
  • Lack of Consideration (Potentially): In some cases, arguing insufficient or no additional consideration was given for the restraint.
  • If you believe your ROTA is unenforceable, consult with Aucamp Attorneys to assess your legal options and potential for challenging the agreement in court.

Before signing a ROTA, carefully consider:

  • Scope of Restrictions: Understand exactly what activities, industries, and roles you are restricted from after leaving. Is it too broad and limiting for your future career prospects?
  • Duration: Is the restraint period (e.g., 6 months, 1 year, 2 years) reasonable? How will it impact your ability to find new work?
  • Geographical Area: Does the geographical restriction make sense for your industry and career? Is it limited to areas where your employer genuinely operates, or is it overly broad?
  • Legitimate Business Interest: Is there a genuine and justifiable business reason for the restraint? Are you likely to possess confidential information or client relationships that warrant this restriction?
  • Consideration: Is the employer offering any specific compensation or benefits in exchange for you agreeing to the ROTA?
  • Seek Legal Advice: If you are unsure about any aspect of a ROTA, or feel it is unfair or overly restrictive, consult with Aucamp Attorneys for independent legal advice before signing.
  • Enforcement & Disputes
Show all FAQs in Category

Employee Restraint of Trade

What is a Restraint of Trade?

A restraint of trade is a contractual provision limiting an employee's post-employment activities to prevent unfair competition. It seeks to protect proprietary interests

Restraint of Trade Agreements in South Africa: A Legal Overview

Restraint of trade clauses, commonly included in South African employment contracts, aim to protect an employer's legitimate business interests after an employee leaves their service. These clauses restrict a former employee's ability to work for a competitor or start a competing business for a specific period and within a defined geographical area. While designed to safeguard confidential information, client relationships, and goodwill, the enforceability of these restraints is subject to strict legal scrutiny.

  • Trade Secrets Confidential and commercially valuable information not publicly known.
  • Confidential Information Sensitive business data like customer lists, pricing strategies, and operational procedures.
  • Trade Connections Established relationships with clients and suppliers.
  • Goodwill The established reputation and customer loyalty of the business.

Enforceability of Restraints 

While restraints of trade are legal in South Africa, their enforceability hinges on reasonableness and public policy. The onus lies on the *employee* to prove that a restraint is unreasonable. Courts consider several factors when assessing reasonableness:

  • Protectable Interest Does the employer have a legitimate business interest worthy of protection?
  • Potential Prejudice Could the former employee's actions genuinely harm that interest? Mere competition is insufficient; there must be a risk of actual or potential harm.
  • Reasonableness of Duration and Scope Is the restraint's duration, geographical area, and scope of prohibited activities proportionate to the protected interest? Overly broad restrictions are unlikely to be enforced. A restraint covering the entire country for several years, for example, might be deemed unreasonable, particularly for a junior employee.
  • Public Policy Does the restraint unduly restrict an individual's right to work and trade freely, conflicting with public interest?

Key Legal Principles and Considerations

  • Constitutional Right to Trade South Africa's Constitution guarantees the right to choose a trade, occupation, or profession freely. Courts balance this right against the principle of pacta sunt servanda (agreements must be kept).
  • Onus of Proof  The employee bears the burden of proving the restraint is unreasonable.
  • Proportionality The restraint must be proportionate to the interest being protected. It should not be used merely to stifle competition.
  • Specific Circumstances Each case is assessed on its unique facts. The seniority of the employee, their access to confidential information, and the nature of the business are all relevant.
  • Tacit Acceptance Even without a signed agreement, an employee may be bound by a restraint if their conduct indicates tacit acceptance.
  • Unfair Dismissal The enforceability of a restraint after an unfair dismissal remains a complex area of law. Recent case law suggests that if the restraint specifically excludes its operation in cases of unfair dismissal, it might not be enforceable.

Examples of Breaches

  •  Starting a competing business.
  • Joining a direct competitor.
  • Soliciting clients or employees of the former employer.

Remedies for Breach

Employers can seek legal remedies for breaches of restraint, including

  • Interdicts Court orders preventing the former employee from engaging in the restricted activities.
  • Damages Claims Seeking compensation for financial losses suffered due to the breach.

Alternatives to Restraints

  • Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) Focus on protecting confidential information without restricting employment.
  • Garden Leave Paid leave during the notice period, preventing the employee from immediately joining a competitor.

Restraint of Trade Agreements in South Africa: Key Recommendations for Businesses - Aucamp Attorneys Guidance

Clearly Define Protectable Interests
Focus on specific Confidential Information, Customer Connections, and in limited cases, Goodwill.
Recommendation: Internally assess and document legitimate business interests for each role needing a ROTA.
Ensure Reasonableness
Restraints must be reasonable in Scope (Activity), Duration, and Geography to be enforceable. Avoid overly broad clauses.
Recommendation: Tailor scope, duration, and area to each role and the specific interests protected. Less is more.
Provide Adequate Consideration
Strengthen enforceability with specific consideration beyond just employment.
Recommendation Consult Aucamp Attorneys on appropriate consideration for your industry and roles. Document it clearly.
Draft Clear, Legal Agreements
Avoid ambiguity, use plain language, and ensure compliance with South African law.
Recommendation Invest in professionally drafted, SA-specific ROTAs by Aucamp Attorneys. Avoid templates.
Implement ROTAs Consistently 
Explain ROTAs clearly, document confidential information protection, and monitor for breaches.
Recommendation Develop a ROTA policy, train staff, and have breach monitoring processes.
Prepare for Enforcement Realities
Enforcement is costly. Gather breach evidence, consider urgent court action, and weigh costs vs. benefits.
Recommendation Discuss enforcement strategies with Aucamp Attorneys before breaches occur.
Regularly Review and Update
Keep ROTAs legally compliant and relevant as laws and your business evolve.
Recommendation Schedule regular ROTA reviews with Aucamp Attorneys.

How Aucamp Attorneys Can Help We offer comprehensive ROTA services

Restraint of trade agreements are complex legal instruments. Seeking professional legal advice is crucial for both employers seeking to protect their business interests and employees concerned about the restrictions placed on their future career prospects. Understanding the principles of reasonableness and public policy is essential for navigating this area of South African law. Contact Aucamp Attorneys for legal guidance relating to any Restraint of Trade legal uncertainties.